Extract vs Porkbun
Extract scores higher on the AgentReady, 71/100 against 57/100. They differ on 12 of the 41 signals. Which ones decides whether an agent can adopt them without a person watching.
What each one is
Extract. Vend API Merchant — Six pay-per-call APIs for AI agents settled in Nano (XNO), no signup, no API key.
Porkbun. Porkbun is a domain registrar and web hosting company offering domain registration, web hosting, email hosting, and domain transfer services.
Where Extract is ahead
Extract passes structured api reference, response examples provided and errors and status codes documented, and Porkbun does not. That is understand, whether an agent can read the docs and work out how the API behaves before calling it.
It also holds adopt: no mandatory sales call, programmatic credential creation and cli available. Porkbun misses those.
And on operate, structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors and retry behavior documented. Porkbun misses those.
Where Porkbun is ahead
Porkbun passes llms-full.txt / full agent docs, and Extract does not. That is discover, whether an agent can find the product at all without being told it exists.
It also holds operate: observable execution and agent compatibility verified. Extract misses those.
What neither does
Both fail public docs discoverable, openapi / spec quality, request examples provided, limits / constraints documented, agent-compatible signup flow, fast time to first request, copyable quickstart, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable. If your agent needs any of those, you will be building it yourself either way.
Score, pillar by pillar
The AgentReady splits into four pillars, scored separately, because a product can be easy to find and still impossible to adopt.
Discover. Porkbun leads 87 to 80. Extract misses public docs discoverable, llms-full.txt / full agent docs; Porkbun misses public docs discoverable.
Understand is whether an agent can read the docs and work out how the API behaves before calling it. Extract leads 69 to 31. Extract misses openapi / spec quality, request examples provided, limits / constraints documented; Porkbun misses structured api reference, openapi / spec quality, request examples provided, response examples provided, errors and status codes documented, limits / constraints documented.
Adopt. Extract leads 80 to 55. Extract misses agent-compatible signup flow, fast time to first request, copyable quickstart; Porkbun misses no mandatory sales call, agent-compatible signup flow, programmatic credential creation, fast time to first request, copyable quickstart, cli available.
Operate. Both sit at 53/100 here. Extract misses idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable, observable execution, agent compatibility verified; Porkbun misses structured, predictable output, machine-readable errors, retry behavior documented, idempotency support, rate-limit behavior predictable.
Pricing
Extract starts at 0.0001 XNO and has a free tier. Porkbun starts at $2.04 with no free tier.
| Extract plans | Porkbun plans |
|---|---|
| extract 0.0001 XNO | .COM $11.08 |
| check-link 0.0001 XNO | .XYZ $2.04 |
| domain-info 0.0005 XNO | .INC $257.98 |
| web-search 0.0001 XNO | .BLOG $2.57 |
| geoip 0.0001 XNO | Email Hosting $3.00/month per inbox, billed annually |
| nano-info 0.0005 XNO | - |
| demo $0 | - |
Signal by signal
| Signal | Extract | Porkbun |
|---|---|---|
| AgentReady | 71 | 57 |
| Discovery | 80 | 87 |
| Understanding | 69 | 31 |
| Adoption | 80 | 55 |
| Operability | 53 | 53 |
| Public API | Yes | Yes |
| MCP server | Yes | Yes |
| OpenAPI spec | Yes | Unknown |
| CLI | Yes | Unknown |
| llms.txt | Yes | Yes |
| Self-serve signup | Yes | Yes |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
Which to pick
Extract clears more of the signals an agent needs, so it is the safer default for unattended use. Full profiles: Extract and Porkbun. Alternatives to each: Extract, Porkbun.
An agent can fetch this as data: POST /v1/compare {"slugs": ["extract", "porkbun"]}